[Etoys] dbus bindings
gaelli at emergent.de
Fri Sep 29 16:21:08 EDT 2006
On Sep 29, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> Right now we're still using Python's dbus bindings, forwarding
>> messages via a pipe into Squeak. This was the simplest to get
> And also by far the safest bet since the Python bindings will be
> updated for sure so we only have to care about the part that we
> want to care about (how to get the messages from/to the image).
> Generally, my feeling is that for our needs (make eToys run
> robustly) this is all we should be doing - I don't see the need to
> write our own bindings if all we need is to exchanges a few
> messages back and forth.
Makes sense. But piping needs OS-Process, no? And OS-Process is not
save/secure so it will have to go, no?
If so, how will Squeak communicate with other processes?
More information about the Etoys