[Sugar-devel] Activity Central's Sugar related priorities.

[Daniel Narvaez]

On Monday, 7 October 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:

> In general one of my frustrations lately is that now that we no longer
> publicly review patches on this mailing list, everyone seems to be
> developing their own version of Sugar.
>
>>
>> Can you elaborate on this one? I haven't noticed this kind of change (and
>> we have not been reviewing most patches on the mailing list since a long
>> long time, well before the github switch).
>>
>>
> I think the change was the movement to github.
> If we can add sugar-devel mailing list to the github mail destinations,
> that can be solved.
>

I was mostly concerned about Samuel feeling that everyone is developing
they're own version of Sugar. I don't see that or at least I don't see
differences with the past.

We probably can have sugar-devel as email destination... Though I'm not
sure why people wouldn't just watch the modules they are interested in? It
seems more flexible. Anyway not opposed to send all modules to the whole
mailing list if there is consensus on that.


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131007/f405de40/attachment.html>