quozl at laptop.org
Wed Jul 3 19:46:03 EDT 2013
I don't think many users would get that luxury, and of those that do I
don't think managing user expectations will be done.
p.s. no such thing as XO-1.0 ;-)
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:23:52PM -0400, Kevin Gordon Gmail wrote:
> All good for performance testing from a developer point of view. However, from
> a user experience point of view, taking an XO 1.0 running an old version and
> replacing it with an XO1.75 running a new version and seeing performance
> decrease I can be 'interesting'. In fact, I would argue that it is a necessary
> piece of knowledge to properly manage user expectations.
> Sent from my currently functioning gadget
> From: Martin Langhoff
> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 19:15
> To: James Cameron; Yioryos Asprobounitis; OLPC Devel
> Subject: Re: XO-1(.75)
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:10 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> > versions, the comparison is uninteresting.
> +1 -- we got some performance gains in drivers... and we lost some
> performance in the GTK3 PyGI battle.
> So it is paramount to compare matched sw versions.
> martin.langhoff at gmail.com
> - ask interesting questions
> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
> ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Devel