Gnome in os9

[Tony Anderson]

Hi,

I get a similar error trying to run Firefox on an xo-1.75. I suspect the 
problem is that these are binaries that can not be run on an Arm system.

Tony

On 11/07/2012 12:00 PM, devel-request at lists.laptop.org wrote:
> Send Devel mailing list submissions to
> 	devel at lists.laptop.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	devel-request at lists.laptop.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	devel-owner at lists.laptop.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: [Sugar-devel] Multi-touch test activity (Martin Langhoff)
>     2. Re: [Sugar-devel] Multi-touch test activity (Bert Freudenberg)
>     3. gcc-4.7.x and kernel compilation (Yioryos Asprobounitis)
>     4. Gnome in os9 (Yioryos Asprobounitis)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 17:50:17 -0500
> From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
> To: Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
> Cc: OLPC Devel <devel at lists.laptop.org>,	Sugar Devel
> 	<sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Multi-touch test activity
> Message-ID:
> 	<CACPiFCJ-tDzyKoUBRHvcgwdJJv=NtUSTqqsZL9yuV3Z_XWJXCw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> Ah, thanks. I wasn't even going to file a bug report about the aliasing because that is a limitation inherent to the kind of sensor we have.
>
> There are of course limitations, but we are in the process of tuning
> and tightening things on the IR.
>
> All sensor types have some forms of aliasing. If you know how, you can
> confuse capacitive sensors too :-)
>
>
>
> m
> --
>   martin.langhoff at gmail.com
>   martin at laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
>   - ask interesting questions
>   - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
>   - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:02:06 +0100
> From: Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
> To: Sugar Devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Cc: OLPC Devel <devel at lists.laptop.org>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Multi-touch test activity
> Message-ID: <B0804DB5-A75E-4874-840C-98656F374F00 at freudenbergs.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> On 2012-11-06, at 23:50, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>> Ah, thanks. I wasn't even going to file a bug report about the aliasing because that is a limitation inherent to the kind of sensor we have.
>>
>> There are of course limitations, but we are in the process of tuning
>> and tightening things on the IR.
>
> Okay. The breaking up of touch contacts was surprising. I attached a photo here:
>
> 	http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/12282
>
>> All sensor types have some forms of aliasing. If you know how, you can
>> confuse capacitive sensors too :-)
>
> Yep. You may find my updated activity version useful in testing:
>
> 	http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4611/
>
> I modified it to keep displaying the last touches.
>
> Single-touch works pretty well already, tweaking multi-touch sounds good :)
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:58:36 -0800 (PST)
> From: Yioryos Asprobounitis <mavrothal at yahoo.com>
> To: OLPC Devel <devel at lists.laptop.org>
> Subject: gcc-4.7.x and kernel compilation
> Message-ID:
> 	<1352303916.38442.YahooMailClassic at web163402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> As far as I can see fedora-18 uses gcc-4.7.3. From what I understand (and tested, though with gcc-4.7.1) with gcc-4.7.x, 2.6.35 kernel compilation fails  because of a asmregparm call in ptrace.h, .
> I was wondering if the olpc-2.6.35 kernel source should be patched with this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1301031/ to avoid future issues.
> The patch (and resulting kernels) work fine BTW.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:10 -0800 (PST)
> From: Yioryos Asprobounitis <mavrothal at yahoo.com>
> To: OLPC Devel <devel at lists.laptop.org>
> Subject: Gnome in os9
> Message-ID:
> 	<1352306470.43858.YahooMailClassic at web163403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I can understand is not a priority right now but I ventured a bit on the GNOME side of os9. Is considerably improved!
> A couple of issues on the XO-1.75. Abiword exits with the cryptic "Aborted".
> Switching back to Sugar (or restarting X) takes a good 30 seconds after the gnome panel has exited, with no feed back. Looks like hanged.
> Also Xtrem somehow sneaked in back in the build.
> None of these is the case on the XO-1.
>
> In both XO-1 and 1.75, Etoys is under "sound and video", Squeak is not working because it can not find the squeak.image and fonts in Audacity UI are too big.
> In the date/time control panel, location changes do not "stick".
> I do not know if the 80MB location data (discussed earlier), has been removed and it is responsible for this behavior, but if it is, it may need to provide some feedback or remove the options because now it just looks broken.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
>
> End of Devel Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11
> *************************************
> .
>