F17-ARM devel tools
mavrothal at yahoo.com
Mon May 7 15:29:06 EDT 2012
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
> To: "Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal at yahoo.com>, "OLPC Devel" <devel at lists.laptop.org>
> Date: Monday, May 7, 2012, 2:12 PM
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:26 PM,
> Martin Langhoff
> <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
> > <mavrothal at yahoo.com>
> >> groupinstall'ed "Development Tools" on 21009o2 and
> noticed 2 things.
> >> Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is
> >> gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm.
> >> Are these expected and OK to go on?
> > Yeah, I think all ARM rpms are expected to be unsigned.
> The builders
> > are not "official" yet.
> They are signed generally although I think the signing is a
> bit behind
> so there's likely some that aren't signed. It should catch
> up in the
> next day or so now that things are settling down for the
> mainline F-17
> release. It's not the fastest of processes and it's one
> of the few
> bits of releases that is a manual process as it requires
> someone to
> enter the key for the signing.
More information about the Devel