os-builder: could we roll a 1.3.1?

[Martin Langhoff]

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Martin Langhoff
<martin.langhoff at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ho-hum. Not convinced. Here's why:

Nag nag. Would you consider 1.3.1?

I've re-reviewed the patches. Some more reasons that a potential 1.3.1
is safe to recommend:

 - Many changes are in oats_cfg and custom_scripts, which are not used
for 10.1.x builds

 - Changes to osbuilder.py are in oob_config interpolation support,
skipping .rpmsave files, and adding /bin and /sbin to the path.

Happy to leave the "bump initial disk image size to 4G" patch out as
it might impact ext3 metadata stuff subtly.

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff at gmail.com
 martin at laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff