Bad interaction between sleep timeouts and Salut?
dsd at laptop.org
Thu Sep 16 14:32:27 EDT 2010
On 16 September 2010 18:54, John Watlington <wad at laptop.org> wrote:
> On XO-1.5, the use of an SD interface makes suspend/resume without
> turning off the WLAN work much better.
Actually, http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9960 shows that wake-on-WLAN is
unreliable on XO-1.5. It's a trivial test to make it break.
In another ticket, Hal repeated the same test on XO-1 and was able to
reproduce it, but only after a much longer time.
In other words, XO-1 wasn't perfect and XO-1.5 has regressed quite
significantly in this area.
More information about the Devel