[Sugar-devel] ANNOUNCE: Sugar 0.88 for the XO-1

[Gonzalo Odiard]

CentOS ?

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Tim McNamara
<paperless at timmcnamara.co.nz>wrote:

> On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
>> > for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments,
>> > although we're also attempting to merge a couple of low-risk features
>> > developed in Uruguay.
>> >
>> > Full details are here:
>> >
>> >  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Sugar-0.88_Notes
>>
>
>> Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
> Just for my knowledge, does Fedora have an equivalent to Ubuntu's long-term
> support releases?
>
> Without thinking too deeply about the implications, it make sense (to me)
> to peg XO development to something that's stable over a few years. That way
> package versions etc will be widely known and consistent.
>
> /me reads [1]. Apparently not. Is there anyway to achieve
> something similar without needing to pay for RHEL, which is probably a bit
> of an overkill?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tim McNamara
> @timClicks
>
> [1]
> http://news.cnet.com/Long-term-Fedora-Linux-support-ending/2100-7344_3-6146604.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


-- 
Gonzalo Odiard
Responsable de Desarrollo
Sistemas Australes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100530/ec8ae482/attachment.html>