OLPC/Marvell Press Release

[Garrett Goebel]

Doubtless it would be painful... but...

openjdk _is_ open source.

Jython?



On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM, rihoward1 at gmail.com
<rihoward1 at gmail.com>wrote:

> You are correct.  Android development is Java based.  It is based on a
> subset of Java functionality with the android API built on top of that.
>
> If you want a QT based environment look at Meego
> http://meego.com/developers.
>
>
> On May 28, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Putting some kittens at risk, it would be useful to have some analysis
> of
> >> both the work involved and potential benefits to an Android port, a Qt
> port,
> >> etc. I am not suggesting we divert our current efforts, as we are quite
> >> lean, but a better understanding of these options would be useful in
> >> defining our future roadmaps.
> >
> > Isn't Android application development Java based?
> >
> > Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel at lists.laptop.org
> > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100528/e26f95e6/attachment.html>