ANNOUNCE: New F11 XO-1build 115 Paraguay

[Yioryos Asprobounitis]

I'll go with Mikus on that.
With at least 3 development streams some qualifier is needed in the naming. eg os115x1/os115x15/os115py

--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Mikus Grinbergs <mikus at bga.com> wrote:

> From: Mikus Grinbergs <mikus at bga.com>
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: New F11 XO-1build 115 Paraguay
> To: "Bernie Innocenti" <bernie at codewiz.org>
> Cc: "OLPC Devel" <devel at lists.laptop.org>, "Fedora OLPC List" <fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 7:38 PM
> In my opinion, the name selected for
> this Paraguay build can create
> quite a bit of confusion.
> 
> It used to be possible to distinguish within current
> development of
> F11-based builds by their naming -- 11 (or thereabouts)
> from Parrish for
> the XO-1, 67 (or thereabouts) from Innocenti for the XO-1,
> 116 (or
> thereabouts) from Ball for the XO-1.5.  [64 and 200
> were signed - so
> somewhat "outsiders".]
> 
> Now every mention of "115" will have to be qualified "-- I
> mean the one
> focused for Paraguay"" versus "-- I mean the one for
> general XO-1.5
> testing".
> 
> Bah,  mikus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> olpc mailing list
> olpc at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/olpc
>