git help needed for 2.6.34 kernel branch revival
tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Thu Aug 19 12:34:56 EDT 2010
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:01, Martin Langhoff
<martin.langhoff at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
>> Thanks for the advice. This is effectively the "399 patches" approach
>> I mentioned.
> Yes indeed. I couldn't tell if you knew about using format-patch and
> am separately -
>> For the 2.6.31 to 2.6.34 move, no rebasing happened. The 2.6.34 kernel
>> tree was simply merged into the 188.8.131.52 + olpc tree.
>> I think this was a mistake, given that 2.6.34 doesn't logically follow
>> on from 184.108.40.206.
> Yeah. Ugly mistake.
>> And we should put more effort into upstreaming so that the
>> amount of rebasing work is not so great each time.
> Always true. Helps when you have a kernel hacker around. We've lost ours :-/
> Any kernel hacker reading this should look at:
> http://www.laptop.org/en/utility/people/opportunities.shtml ...
Considered asking Corbet to put some kind of plug in LWN?
May also help attending any of the several kernel
conf/summit/gettogethers around Boston.
> martin.langhoff at gmail.com
> martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
> - ask interesting questions
> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Devel