New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119
mavrothal at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 12 15:40:37 EDT 2010
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> wrote:
> From: Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org>
> Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119
> To: "Peter Robinson" <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Devel" <devel at lists.laptop.org>, "Fedora OLPC" <fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Monday, April 12, 2010, 9:15 AM
> On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 17:57 +0100,
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >> Finally, I guess you have thought of it, but
> by the
> > >> time 10.2 will be out F11 repositories will
> be down
> > >> and thus the builds totally frozen
> > >
> > > I think it would have been better to rebase on
> F12 6 months ago.
> > > Now it's way too close to the release date :-(
> > I recommended F-12 which was in beta when this process
> started but was
> > ignored. I noticed the other day that dsd has created
> a F-12 branch in
> > git but I think we should be aiming straight for F-13
> now. It'll be
> > out in a little over a month, is quite stable already
> and have will be
> > supported for another 14 months.
> F13, btw, seems like a very solid release to me.
I do not know why re-basing on F13 will reach deployment status much faster than F11 and will not be at the same point a year from now.
The XO is a _production_ machine. Makes no sense to run development/short-lived OS. Maybe the RHEL/CentOS idea should not be dismissed, if feasible.
> // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
> \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
> olpc mailing list
> olpc at lists.fedoraproject.org
More information about the Devel