XO-1.5 follow-on impression

Benjamin M. Schwartz bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu
Fri Oct 16 13:01:16 EDT 2009

Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected 
> without a proxy.  

I don't quite understand this statement.  Were you connected to the XO-1.5
over the internet, using a technique like X forwarding or VNC?

> The principal user-perception experience where improvement would 
> still be welcome is video support.  Changes to the screen (e.g., 
> show/hide Frame) are not being done "smoothly".  And when viewing 
> "moving pictures", the currently scanty hardware acceleration (e.g., 
> ticket #9407) is noticeable.

In the case of a remote desktop session over the internet, video
performance is almost always limited by the network and protocol, not the
server hardware's rendering speed.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20091016/05a92a04/attachment.sig>

More information about the Devel mailing list