Images partitioned right? Good USB drives? (Re: Woodhouse on flash storage)
S Page
skierpage at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 19:23:17 EDT 2009
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Mitch Bradley <wmb at laptop.org> wrote:
> b) If you must construct a fixed partition layout for use on multiple
> different devices, align each partition on at least a 4MiB boundary.
> That means that you "waste" 4M for the partition map (one 512-byte
> sector padded out to a 4 MiB boundary, but oh well). For devices 2 GiB
> or less - the previous generation - maybe 1 MiB alignment would be okay,
> as such devices are likely to have smaller erase blocks. Those numbers
> seem "safe" to me.
1.
Do the F11 / SoaS "overwrite your USB/SD device" XO images follow this
guideline?
cat soas??xo.2gremovable.tar.lzma | lzma -dc - | tar xf - -O > /dev/sdX
(The way a boot image is created and distributed as multiple
monolithic 379+ MB files seems crazy -- surely it's just a collection
of files, tweaks to the existing MBR, and some disk partitioning and
FS layout requirements. But that's a different discussion. ;-) )
2.
The old Fedora 10 on XO project specifically recommended SanDisk
Extreme III SD cards. Can anyone suggest generally-good brands of USB
flash drives?
(I have a cheap USB flash drive that has "gone crazy" after two
/dev/sdb reblastings; often usb-creator leaves it in a bizarre state
and dosfsck reports hundreds of errors it can't repair. Weird.)
Thanks for all you do!
--
=S Page
More information about the Devel
mailing list