Bootloader question
Martin Langhoff
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 04:18:06 EDT 2009
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Guylhem Aznar <olpc at guylhem.net> wrote:
> Of course I do, but IMHO there are also some things that could have
> been done differently.
Ah, hindsight is sooooo easy ;-)
As Mitch's reply shows, we have been looking at the boot times and
studying any low-hanging-fruit there.
Your stated goal allows for a couple of options... see below.
> on a SQL database (which needs ~600 Mb of flash total). I'm more of a
> debian guy, so I took what I knew to have a working base which can be
> improved.
Maybe try deb-xo on an SD card? As Mitch mentions, booting from SD
skips various steps that are slow on our platform.
> Pretests results show a usage pattern where doctors prefer to power on
> the laptop when some specific information is needed. This behaviour is
How about suspend or hibernate?
> So I see a boot delay that could be easily cut by half,
You see lots of things we'd like to have! Have a read of Mitch's
reply, there are several spots where you could help us.
martin
--
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
More information about the Devel
mailing list