Fedora Desktop on XO
gregsmitholpc at gmail.com
Tue Jan 6 17:41:31 EST 2009
No problem being blunt.
I don't know yet how far behind we are or what it will take to catch up.
We are close if we create a target bug list in the next two weeks then
start daily triage and weekly test blitzes.
Quality is my primary concern, especially if you throw in a lot of new
code and potential process changes with Sugar.
Once we get building and testing, it will be a matter of code quality
and how quickly can we fix important bugs.
On the feature front, my main concern is security/activation/lease
management features. Point #2 here:
Good progress on signing delegation and faster imaging. However, lease
management and image customization need some love. They are critical for
Ethiopia and Peru and others.
In short, we have a good chance to release with major new features in
March. We just need to pick up the pace and keep people focused.
In terms of the thread, Deepak said that a replacement for JFFS2 is not
in the plan for 9.1.0. I agree. It needs more work from a test/design
perspective and it needs better definition of the ROI (work effort vs
The choice of file system isn't a deal breaker for the Fedora Desktop
feature. The hard part will be picking the right desktop (more on that
soon, I already love the dancing benchmark bears :-), making it fit on
the NAND, and testing it enough to prove its usable.
Michael Stone wrote:
> I don't mean to be nasty, but I do feel the need to be blunt:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 04:28:36PM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> We are definitely behind where I would like to be at this stage.
> How far behind?
>> However, we'll only move the date when we must and we'll only do it
>> to improve quality
> What exactly did you think Deepak and Chris were discussing doing?
More information about the Devel