[Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

[Martin Dengler]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:36:44AM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at sugarlabs.org>:
> > 2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>:
> >> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at sugarlabs.org>:
> >>> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after
> >>> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to
> >>
> >> The ones on the ramdisk? :-(
> >
> > Is ~/.sugar/default/logs in the ramdisk? This would be the first time
> > I hear about it.
> 
> OLPC's builds (at least the F7/F9 based series) I understood they were
> on a ramdisk. Looking at it now, however, it seems that they aren't --
> but a restart of X clears it out anyway.
> 
> So by the time the problem is _seen_, *poof*, logs are gone.

You sure that ~/.sugar/default/logs doesn't just get renamed to
~/.sugar/default/logs/NNNNN?  That's what happens now, but perhaps not
on older builds?

> m

Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090821/94637e49/attachment.sig>