Master kernel in Joyride.
katzj at redhat.com
Fri Oct 17 08:31:58 EDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 21:08 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On Oct 16 2008, at 21:11, Jeremy Katz was caught saying:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 20:18 -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> > > Now that the Joyride floodgates are open, which kernel branch do you
> > > recommend we start testing in Joyride for the 9.1 release? If the
> > > master branch, are there any regressions in it compared to the testing
> > > branch? Which of 2.6.2 should we aim to ship with 9.1?
> > If 9.1 isn't going to be released for about six months, I'd suggest
> > actually waiting and picking a later kernel -- at least 2.6.28 (likely
> > release in January), possibly 2.6.29 (probably April) depending on the
> > exact schedule for 9.1.
> Ack. But to get there, we definetely want to get k.org latest into
> testing so we find issues in conjunction with changes to kernel.org
Sure -- and one nice thing is that there's already some testing of stock
2.6.27 on the XO underway with the Fedora on XO testing efforts
More information about the Devel