Call for Papers/Talks/Ideas! "Update.2 Mini-Conference"

[Tomeu Vizoso]

Hmm, yesterday I executed free after launching some activities and got
this results:

http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-March/004650.html

Am I very wrong to think that we can save 3.6MB per python activity instance?

Tomeu

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:21 PM, NoiseEHC <NoiseEHC at freemail.hu> wrote:
> It is the problem that every page will be modified (and so copied) if it
>  contains a reference count so the metadata effectively cannot be shared.
>  http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2007-September/006617.html
>  Also mentioned in (point 9.)
>  http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/community-news/2007-February/000043.html
>
>
>
>
>  Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>  > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:50 PM, NoiseEHC <NoiseEHC at freemail.hu> wrote:
>  >
>  >> Could somebody answer these questions?
>  >>  1. What is the status of zlib -> lzo transition in jffs2?
>  >>  2. What is the status of the new X architecture? (The name is DRM but I
>  >>  am not sure.)
>  >>  3. What is the status of the shared page python stuff? Will the
>  >>  reference count problem will be solved in Python 3.0? Will it be
>  >>  released in the foreseeable future?
>  >>
>  >
>  > Can you explain what's that "reference count problem" or give any pointer?
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  >
>  > Tomeu
>  >
>  >
>  >
>