OLPC config in salut in F9?

[Morgan Collett]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 18:27, Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpgritti at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Morgan Collett
> <morgan.collett at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes
>> <guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit :
>>>> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
>>>> > Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut
>>>> > in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work
>>>> > in the F-9 branch and not need to fork.
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right
>>>> now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches.  If it makes
>>>> sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem
>>>> with you doing enabling it.
>>>
>>> Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO
>>> security model (Rainbow).
>>> Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does).
>>
>> OK, then we want to make an OLPC-3 branch and build salut there with
>> the patches.
>
> It would still be good if we could --enable-olpc on the F9 packages,
> so that Sugar can work right in Fedora 9. Morgan could you take care
> of that?

Yes, I'll do that.

> I agree that the ugly rainbow workarounds should be kept in OLPC-3.

I've done a scratch build of telepathy-salut for dist-f9 with the
patches: http://dev.laptop.org/~morgan/telepathy-salut/

I'll request the branch.

Morgan