OLPC config in salut in F9?

[Marco Pesenti Gritti]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Morgan Collett
<morgan.collett at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes
> <guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>> Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit :
>>> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
>>> > Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut
>>> > in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work
>>> > in the F-9 branch and not need to fork.
>>>
>>> Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right
>>> now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches.  If it makes
>>> sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem
>>> with you doing enabling it.
>>
>> Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO
>> security model (Rainbow).
>> Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does).
>
> OK, then we want to make an OLPC-3 branch and build salut there with
> the patches.

It would still be good if we could --enable-olpc on the F9 packages,
so that Sugar can work right in Fedora 9. Morgan could you take care
of that?

I agree that the ugly rainbow workarounds should be kept in OLPC-3.

Marco