journal object transfer for 8.2

[Marco Pesenti Gritti]

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Michael Stone <michael at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:18:10PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
>> I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the
>> robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level
>> from the Journal is seemingly a high priority.
>
> My feeling is that since Sugar has no control over the robustness of the
> network, the feature will function poorly, if at all. Consequently, I
> would rather see bug-fixes which will bring the system closer to its
> intended operation with high probability. However, this is just a
> personal preference. I'm (mostly) happy to release whatever you send my
> way, so long as it fixes more problems than it creates.
>
>> Half of the high-priority bugs in the link you provide are in fact not
>> really Sugar bugs, but subsystem bugs. The others don't seem to be
>> particularly pressing.
>
> Perhaps a few hours of triage are called for? Here are a few of my
> favorites:

After the feature freeze we should definitely spend a good amount of
time on bugs triage. The sugar components has not been seriously
triaged in the last several months.

Marco