journal object transfer for 8.2

[Michael Stone]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:18:10PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the
> robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level
> from the Journal is seemingly a high priority. 

My feeling is that since Sugar has no control over the robustness of the
network, the feature will function poorly, if at all. Consequently, I
would rather see bug-fixes which will bring the system closer to its
intended operation with high probability. However, this is just a
personal preference. I'm (mostly) happy to release whatever you send my
way, so long as it fixes more problems than it creates.

> Half of the high-priority bugs in the link you provide are in fact not
> really Sugar bugs, but subsystem bugs. The others don't seem to be
> particularly pressing.

Perhaps a few hours of triage are called for? Here are a few of my
favorites:

  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7011  <--- Zoom buttons should cycle
  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7220  <--- Populate activity ring
  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/4236  <--- Cancel activity startup
  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7020  <--- Force activity shutdown

  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6895  <--- Access point UI
  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6909  

  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5444  <--- Robustness to failure

  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6148  <--- Non-ASCII Activity Names

  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6471  <--- Activity startup times
  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6472

  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6237  <--- Cloaked APs
  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/6281  <--- 802.1x for NY,UY! 

  http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/4877  <--- Session API

Michael