specifying what services Activities may use
bobbypowers at gmail.com
Tue Jul 29 22:49:43 EDT 2008
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Mikus Grinbergs <mikus at bga.com> wrote:
> A DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE !!!
> I've been randomly launching Activities on 2226. __Far too many__
> of them fail -- because csound was changed, numeric was changed,
> mixer was changed, etc., etc., etc.
> Given that there *are* Activities out in the hands of users (both
> with G1G1 and with country distributions), the question becomes:
> HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO AVOID USER-PERCEIVED REGRESSIONS ?
> For what it's worth, my opinion is that if users who *had* been able
> to run many different Activities were to be offered 2226, they would
> be better off staying with what they have.
did these work in 708? how about in joyrides before we started
slimming things down?
> p.s. I started this topic to point out that "slimming down the
> build" could inhibit Activities *yet to be developed*. But it turns
> out that "slimming down the build" is killing *existing* Activities.
slimming down the build WONT inhibit activities yet to be developed -
those activities can include libraries in the XO bundles. My activity
(Model) does that, so does Physics, so does Develop, and a number of
other ones do too.
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Devel