[laptop.org #16813] joyride builds failing due to insufficient space

[Morgan Collett]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 20:29, C. Scott Ananian <cscott at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
>>  sugar - 0.81.6-4.20080715git8137d5c37f.fc9.i386: Insufficient space
>> in download directory
>> /home/cscott/public_html/xo-1/streams/joyride/build2187-20080720_2235/devel_jffs2/install_root/var/cache/yum/olpc_development/packages
>> to download
>
> It looks like xs-dev.laptop.org has plenty of space in the specified
> directory.  After cleaning up the incomplete builds, it seems like the
> "new" problem is related to abiword-plugins:
>  http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/joyride/build2188/devel_jffs2/build.log
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>  file /usr/lib/abiword-2.6/plugins/libAbiCollab.so conflicts between
> attempted installs of libabiword-2.6.4-2.olpc3 and
> libabiword-plugins-2.6.0.svn20071127-2
>  file /usr/lib/abiword-2.6/plugins/libAbiOpenDocument.so conflicts
> between attempted installs of libabiword-2.6.4-2.olpc3 and
> libabiword-plugins-2.6.0.svn20071127-2
>  file /usr/lib/abiword-2.6/plugins/libLoadBindings.so conflicts
> between attempted installs of libabiword-2.6.4-2.olpc3 and
> libabiword-plugins-2.6.0.svn20071127-2
>  file /usr/share/abiword-2.6/glade/ap_UnixDialog_CollaborationJoin.glade
> conflicts between attempted installs of libabiword-2.6.4-2.olpc3 and
> libabiword-plugins-2.6.0.svn20071127-2
>
> It looks like we branched libabiword for olpc3 but didn't branch
> libabiword-plugins?  Does anyone on devel@ know who did that, and who
> can fix it?  Thanks.

Marc Maurer (uwog) did it.

>From an irc conversation, it appears that libabiword now includes the
plugins. If it's time sensitive and he hasn't confirmed, drop
libabiword-plugins from the build until he can explain.

Here's the irc log in case I'm reading it wrong.

Jul 17 15:21:56 <uwog>  dgilmore: ok, in fedora i have 1 abiword package
Jul 17 15:22:23 <uwog>  dgilmore: for olpc, we have libabiword,
libabiword-plugins, and pyabiword
Jul 17 15:22:33 <uwog>  dgilmore: the question is, how to merge
Jul 17 15:22:35 <dgilmore>      uwog: ok
Jul 17 15:23:00 <uwog>  dgilmore: i can in fedora build libabiword and
abiword from 1 source rpm
Jul 17 15:23:10 <dgilmore>      uwog: can we make abiword  use
libabiword libabiword-plugins and pyabiword?
Jul 17 15:23:12 <uwog>  dgilmore: pyabiword then depends on libabiword
Jul 17 15:23:20 <dgilmore>      uwog: ok
Jul 17 15:23:31 <uwog>  dgilmore: but in fedora, i do NOT want a
seperate plugins package
Jul 17 15:23:36 <dgilmore>      uwog: have you talked with the fedora
maintainer of abiword?
Jul 17 15:23:45 <uwog>  dgilmore: that's me
Jul 17 15:23:53 <dgilmore>      uwog: :)  makes it easy then
Jul 17 15:24:02 <uwog>  dgilmore: i wish :)
Jul 17 15:24:14 <dgilmore>      well makes co-ordinating easy
Jul 17 15:24:41 <uwog>  dgilmore: what i could do, is ditch the
olpc-specific libabiword-plugins package, and just include the plugins
in libabiword
Jul 17 15:24:57 <dgilmore>      uwog: how about you make the
libabiword-plugins  package built when defined by a macro
Jul 17 15:25:07 <uwog>  also an option
Jul 17 15:25:25 <uwog>  but what would that gain us ?
Jul 17 15:25:30 <dgilmore>      uwog: then you can have a branch  copy
over from fedora change a defines   and build
Jul 17 15:25:57 <dgilmore>      uwog: what does the plugins package get us?
Jul 17 15:26:04 <uwog>  well, plugins
Jul 17 15:26:05 <uwog>  :)
Jul 17 15:26:08 <uwog>  but fedora does not have it
Jul 17 15:26:18 <uwog>  it's all currently included in 1 abiword package
Jul 17 15:26:19 <dgilmore>      is there a good reason to have it seperate?
Jul 17 15:26:47 <dgilmore>      i.e.  why did you do it that way in
the first place?
Jul 17 15:27:25 <uwog>  dgilmore: because abiword was shipped for
2.6.x as 2 different tarballs i guess
Jul 17 15:27:34 <uwog>  i doubt there was more rationale than that
Jul 17 15:28:30 <uwog>  dgilmore: do you know if 'fedora' would mind
if i all of a sudden split out libabiword during the f9 cycle ?
Jul 17 15:30:13 <dgilmore>      uwog: its not ideal,  but as long as
someone running yum update gets the same functonality then it will be
ok
Jul 17 15:30:26 <uwog>  ok
Jul 17 15:30:49 <uwog>  dgilmore: so, i will include the plugins in
libabiword... for normal fedora, i will include more plugins than the
olpc build
Jul 17 15:35:13 <dgilmore>      uwog: ok
Jul 17 15:35:24 <uwog>  dgilmore: thx
Jul 17 15:35:26 <dgilmore>      uwog: want me to make you a OLPC-3 branch?
Jul 17 15:35:32 <uwog>  dgilmore: please

Morgan