Code name for 9.1.0

[Ivan Krstić]

On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> We've gone from build numbers, to ship.x, to update.x

Nonsense. The ship.x and update.x were part of the same scheme, and  
that was a _tagging_ scheme, not a naming scheme. It served merely to  
correlate a certain piece of production and deployment information  
(that a build was factory-installed, or meant as a general customer- 
facing update) with a build number.

--
Ivan Krstić <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | http://radian.org