POT inconsistent against code for Record activity

[Sayamindu Dasgupta]

Hello,

The main issue here seems to be the fact that the location of the
Record repository has changed (earlier, the Record POT was fetched
from a SVN repository). Is this going the repository from where
further Record development will be happening in the future ? In that
case, I'll switch over to the new repository.

Thanks,
Sayamindu

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I noticed right now record-activity.po is based on old POT.
>
> Here is a record in the PO:
>   #: constants.py:106
>   #, python-format
>   msgid "%(1)s hours, %(2)s minutes, %(1)s seconds remaining"
>
> Apparently one of placeholders is incorrect, but this has been fixed in repo
> at the commit of
> http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dsd/record;a=blob;f=po/Record.pot;hb=52e8f3ed365ff53e3fba2bb5a013559bedebdbc1
>
> Header of the PO declares "POT-Creation-Date: 2007-12-20 09:20-0500\n",
> that is even inconsistent to POT in git.
> (In your explanation, POT is generated on Pootle server from source code, right?
>  it seems not to work for this activity)
>
> Could you please take a look and fix it?  Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Translators:
>   You would need to review your translations after the correct POT is merged.
>
> Developers:
>    Currently POT is automatically generated by weekly batch job on
> Pootle server and is merged into each PO.
>    But it seems that few people monitoring it actually.
>    I would suggest you (at least owner of activities that is
> translated on Pootle) to check regularly if string changes have been
> correctly merged to POs.
>    Without that translator might work against wrong strings and it
> would result poor quality of product...
>
>    And I believe we need to document in our development process who
> to check/maintain the consistency,
>    while I don't know who is the right one.
>
> Cheers,
> /Korakurider
>



-- 
Sayamindu Dasgupta
[http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]