Suspended time vs Resumed time in an idle XO

[Giannis Galanis]

It is possible indeed. We have to check.

I will try to test how it works with avahi.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Ricardo Carrano <carrano at ricardocarrano.com>
wrote:

> Yanni,
> But we should note that, not everything that expires, does so because of a
> timer.
> A cache entry may have an associated timestamp and expire in timestamp +
> ttl.
>
>
> I have noticed that an idle machine will resume for some time, and suspend
> > again, several times for no reaso
> > The result is that the suspended time extends the timeout. The timeout
> > does not expire relative to the absolute time, but the time the CPU is
> > alive.
> > So if a 10min timeout is interrupted by a 2min suspend, the timeout will
> > expire 12min after the point it was executed.
> > Scott, does this agree with what you expected?
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080222/25a86b61/attachment.html>