New update.1 build 691

[Benj. Mako Hill]

<quote who="Bert Freudenberg" date="Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:28:12PM +0100">
> However, why did you ask that question only after the build was made,  
> when the package was approved one week ago? There would have been  
> enough time to discuss it.
> 
> And secondly, what *is* the current policy of package inclusion? I  
> was under the impression that getting approval from Jim/Kim/Walter  
> was enough. But now we have to convince you, too? What could be  
> possibly broken in the system by a new activity release? And who else  
> would be authoritative on whether that activity works as intended if  
> not its authors?

The library packages were in exactly the same situation -- approved with
plenty of time but then silently not included. Both SJ and I were
around to answer any questions or issues.

Regards,
Mako

-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako at atdot.cc
http://mako.cc/

Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far
as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080209/eddd1263/attachment.sig>