New update.1 build 691

[Bert Freudenberg]

On Feb 8, 2008, at 19:13 , Dennis Gilmore wrote:

>> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:56 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> On Friday 08 February 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>> This cannot possibly be RC2 because not all approved packages  
>>>> are in.
>>>> Etoys for example.
>>>
>>> I held etoys out because i dont know what critical bug it fixes.
>>>
>>> Dennis
> That is a perfectly acceptable reason  the bug report did not state  
> anything
> other than please include it.
>
> It will get picked up in the next build along with all the other  
> translations.


Fine.

However, why did you ask that question only after the build was made,  
when the package was approved one week ago? There would have been  
enough time to discuss it.

And secondly, what *is* the current policy of package inclusion? I  
was under the impression that getting approval from Jim/Kim/Walter  
was enough. But now we have to convince you, too? What could be  
possibly broken in the system by a new activity release? And who else  
would be authoritative on whether that activity works as intended if  
not its authors?

- Bert -