Translation refresh

[Tomeu Vizoso]

2008/4/20 Kim Quirk <kim at laptop.org>:
> Bernie,
> I'd like to make two points regarding your notes:
>
> 1 - OLPC cannot be responsible for activities. So it is really much better
> that the activities are now separate from the base code to help get this
> point across to the country. As a 'sales' type person, you need to convey
> that activities are built, tested, translated by the community. OLPC will
> not be qualifying or certifying them. The country needs to reserve time and
> resources in its own schedule to help ensure testing and translation of the
> activities that they want. And they can do this, because the activities are
> not tied to our release schedule. If we can separate translations in a
> similar fashion that seems like a good way to go.

So no activities at all are supported by OLPC? (the journal is
technically an activity today, but is set to be merged into the shell
when time permits).

Thanks,

Tomeu