GPLv3

[Bernardo Innocenti]

Jim Gettys wrote:

> And note that in all aggregated work projects, which OLPC is, it
> requires essentially unanimity to effect a license change.  If someone
> asked my opinion right now, for example, it would be "Duh, I dunno: I
> need between a day and a week to understand the issues...."

For code licensed under "GPLv2 or later", there should
be no (legal) requirement to ask anybody's permission.

And Sugar appears to be licensed in this way.

-- 
   // Bernardo Innocenti
 \X/  http://www.codewiz.org/