[Testing] Build 472 - testing

[Dan Williams]

On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 10:15 -0700, Ronak Chokshi wrote:
> True. Please treat our suggestions of builds only as recommendations.
> The final decision of which build should be used for the major
> milestones should come from within OLPC based on the accomplishments
> planned for that milestone. This is the model we usually follow with
> most of our other customers/projects as well.

Ok, I was under the impression that we had to get sign-off for any
CozyBit built firmware before CozyBit could give it to us, before we
could put it in builds.  Is that invalid, or has that changed?

Dan

>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ronak
> 
> 
>                                    
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From:testing-bounces at lists.laptop.org
> [mailto:testing-bounces at lists.laptop.org] On Behalf Of Michail Bletsas
> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 6:11 AM
> To: Dan Williams
> Cc: testing at laptop.org; Kim Quirk; OLPC Developer's List;
> testing-bounces at lists.laptop.org
> Subject: Re: [Testing] Build 472 - testing
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> No we don't.... 
> 
> M. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> 
> Sent by:
> testing-bounces at lists.laptop.org 
> 
> 06/30/2007 11:37 PM 
> 
> 
>                To
> 
> 
> Kim Quirk
> <kim.quirk at gmail.com> 
> 
> 
>                cc
> 
> 
> testing at laptop.org, "OLPC Developer's List" <devel at laptop.org> 
> 
> 
>           Subject
> 
> 
> Re: [Testing]
> Build 472 -
> testing
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 08:10 -0400, Kim Quirk wrote:
> > It looks like we may need/want to get the latest Marvell firmware
> and
> > all known flag day updates into the build on Monday (if possible).
> At
> > some point we just have to take the hit and ask everyone to upgrade,
> > laptops and servers. 
> > 
> > As you mention, Dan, we need to do this in Cambridge first... so
> maybe
> > this should be in Monday's build. I know we have the Marvell
> firmware
> > (or can get it). Is there anything outstanding that we are still
> > waiting on to have this flag day? 
> 
> We need to get Ronak's sign-off on any firmware that we plan to put in
> public builds.  That can take a few days, though sometimes it's quick.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> > Is there a reason NOT to do this as soon as possible?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Kim
> > 
> > On 6/30/07, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> >         On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 21:37 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> >         > On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 11:23 -0400, Kim Quirk wrote: 
> >         > > Test Groups,
> >         > > Build 472 is available, but the biggest problem is that
> it
> >         doesn't get
> >         > > on the mesh or infrastructure AP. Some activities are
> >         working and
> >         > > there is more to see in the Journal than the previous
> >         build. 
> >         > >
> >         > > I'm hoping that we can get another build today with the
> >         network
> >         > > problem fixed since that would be important for our
> >         'Release Candidate
> >         > > 1'. Today's milestone is to get to RC1 which has most of
> >         the basic 
> >         > > functionality that was available in 406 builds. If we
> can
> >         get the mesh
> >         > > connecting again, that would be great!
> >         > >
> >         > > Test release notes:
> >         http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Test_Group_Release_Notes
> >         > > (Anyone can add notes about this release page -- please
> >         do)
> >         >
> >         > I couldn't fix the mesh issues with the current
> >         NetworkManager so I have
> >         > backtracked to an earlier working version in build478.
>  This
> >         one gets on
> >         > the mesh and also on AP points.
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> http://olpc.download.redhat.com/olpc/streams/development/build478/
> >         
> >         So thinking about it again, we don't expect the new svn2621
> NM
> >         bits to
> >         work with any existing mesh networks because the server
> >         software and
> >         hardware needs to change.
> >         
> >         We have to have a flag day in Cambridge too before we can
> get
> >         the new NM 
> >         automeshing bits, because the new bits aren't compatible
> with
> >         the old
> >         bits on the server side.
> >         
> >         Dan
> >         
> >         
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Testing mailing list
> Testing at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
> 
> 
> 
>