Teleconference information for software status meeting tonight.

[Tomeu Vizoso]

Hi,

so, can we have the sysprof kernel module for version 1.0.5 in future
images?

Would make much easier my intended work on profiling.

Thanks,

Tomeu

On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 10:23 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> if it was possible to have the sysprof kernel module for version 1.0.5
> instead of 1.0.3 (and the corresponding sysprof package on the devel
> image) it would make it much easier for profiling sugar.
> 
> >From version 1.0.5 sysprof comes with a text-mode collector that makes
> it much more useful for us. I think it would be easier to update the
> kernel module than to sugarize sysprof (or backport the 1.0.5
> sysprofile-text to use the 1.0.3 module).
> 
> Also I don't understand what means "oprofile may come for free as a
> result of sysprof", I think that oprofile needs it's own kernel module,
> although both use the same kernel infrastructure.
> 
> Don't know if it's possible/easy to use oprofile on the geode, but I
> think that would be nice to have both profilers in order to compare the
> results.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 03:14 +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > Jim Gettys wrote:
> > >
> > > Blizzard:
> > >  - sysprof module has been added to kernel, is untested
> > >   
> > 
> > We used sysprof to debug the perfomance issues with xbook and tamtam. It 
> > works pretty well.
> > 
> > Marco
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel at laptop.org
> > http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at laptop.org
> http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel