[OLPC-devel] Re: OLPC development board

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 17:21 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I fear thats for the firmware and not accessible as a raw NAND
> > interface, AFAICT from the scarce information available.
> 
> I assume it _is_ intended for firmware, yes -- but we don't have it
> hooked up. We were loading firmware from Linux instead.
> 
> So there is a fairly capable NAND flash controller built into the
> Marvell wireless SoC, going spare. Well spotted, Jaya.

Would be interesting if we could offload the NAND work to the Marvell
chip.  Do we have access to the firmware source ?

	tglx