[OLPC-devel] Re: OLPC development board

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 17:21 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I fear thats for the firmware and not accessible as a raw NAND
> interface, AFAICT from the scarce information available.

I assume it _is_ intended for firmware, yes -- but we don't have it
hooked up. We were loading firmware from Linux instead.

So there is a fairly capable NAND flash controller built into the
Marvell wireless SoC, going spare. Well spotted, Jaya.

-- 
dwmw2