[OLPC-devel] Re: Why ACPI DSDT tables?

[Matthew Garrett]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:25:35PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:

>  * cpu powerstates

Hmm, yeah, that's a point. Without using ACPI, we presumably also need 
to write a driver to handle CPU C states? This would presumably 
duplicate quite a lot of logic in the existing ACPI processor driver, so 
we might want to look at abstracting that a little.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org