/proc/device-tree is working
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Sat Dec 30 10:48:43 EST 2006
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 00:34 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> Left to do:
>
> a) Audit the device tree and correct any errors and omissions.
>
> b) Release an Open Firmware version that uses virtual addressing so that
> Linux doesn't clobber it upon startup. The coding is already done, so
> this is just a release and test step. This version is compatible with
> existing kernels so its release doesn't require a simultaneous release
> of a new kernel.
>
> c) Decide whether or not we want to go ahead with the /proc/device-tree
> version, or convert to /sys first. If the latter, we have to develop
> the sysfs version of the code. I think I understand how to convert to
> sysfs for the bulk of the code, but there is still an issue that I don't
> grok, namely the kobjects tie-in.
>
> d) Do the administrative mechanics of expressing the changes as a patch.
>
> e) Start converting OLPC userland code to use the device tree info
> instead of the various ad-hoc detections schemes currently in place.
>
> f) Do whatever needs to be done to announce the patch, submit it
> upstream, or whatever we want to do on that front.
g) Convert drivers to of_device drivers as appropriate -- stuff like the
DCON could be 'detected' by its presence in the device-tree rather than
the hacks we have at the moment.
--
dwmw2
More information about the Devel
mailing list