System software concall minutes - 2006-12-19
wmb at firmworks.com
Wed Dec 20 13:50:19 EST 2006
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> Code for device tree via /proc nearly ready
> Are you sure that you want to introduce new files in /proc which are
> not process-related? You will never get such a change merged upstream.
I'm not sure of anything when it comes to Linux these days. It seems
like everything is a political football.
> What speaks against /sys for that purpose?
The intention was to do /sys at some point, but we had a /proc example
in the PowerPC arch to use as a model.
More information about the Devel