[OLPC-devel] Re: Probably the easiest way to get LinuxBIOS
mtosatti at redhat.com
Wed Aug 16 23:30:58 EDT 2006
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:11:16PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 16:26 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> > > 1) download this OLPC fedora image.
> > > 2) md5 and check the checksum of that file.
> > > 3) dd onto disk or flash key.
> > > 4) make partition bootable.
> > > (this can be "interesting" on flash keys, as I remember...).
> > >
> > If you dd the image onto the whole flash device, the partition map will
> > be part of the image, so the bootable bit will go along for the ride.
> > > 5) boot the disk or flash key.
> Steps 1. - 5. have been working for a long time...
> > > 6) run the SPI flash update utility
> > > 7) power cycle the machine
> > >
> > > Then we can continue into the "install onto internal NAND flash" part of
> > > the process.
> That too should be trivial. I've requested a feature in nandwrite from
> Woodhouse so it can read from stdin. Then the NAND flashing part of it
> is trivial; something like
> modprobe msr
> modprobe nand_ids
> modprobe nand_ecc
> modprobe nand
> modprobe mtdblock
> modprobe mtdchar
> modprobe cs553x_nand
> modprobe zlib_deflate
> modprobe jffs2
> flash_eraseall -j /dev/mtd0
> wget -O - http://olpc.download.redhat.com/olpc/streams/development/latest/images-rpm/olpc-development-rpm-jffs2.img |nandwrite -p /dev/mtd0 -
Are you running sumtool on olpc-development-rpm-jffs2.img per dwmw2 suggestion? (for
faster mount time):
sumtool -n -p -e 128KiB -i `echo $IMAGE | sed -e s/ext3/jffs2/` -o `echo $IMAGE | sed -e
> to avoid having the NAND image on the bootable ext3 image on the USB
> image .
> We can do this right now, but it only leaves us with 12MB free space and
> I expect our distribution to grow a bit. We could also bump the ext3
> size to 1GB and simply include the NAND image embedded in it.. depends
> on how big peoples USB fob's are...
Do we have a script for image generation already?
On the Fedora packaging side of things, we probably want to make an RPM
for buildrom and another for olpcflash, right?
> Also maybe ask the user what build he want to download instead of using
> the "latest" symlink. Or perhaps introduce a "stable" symlink that
> matches what we classify as stable builds (e.g. tested and verified to
> work) as per
> > > Does this seem like a reasonable plan?
>  : The ext3 space usage is already way bigger than jffs2 due to no
> compression. Here are some figures obtained with "df --si"
> build70 on ext3: 316M
> build70 on jffs2: 169M
More information about the Devel