[OLPC-devel] Re: olpcflash 0.1.0 Alpha

[Richard Smith]

> There goes your 493k glibc overhead ;-)

uClibc rocks.

> Does it make sense to merge this back into the original flashrom
> utility?

I though about that but that will massively increase its size won't
it?  So OLPC would still need a seperate utility to include into
buildrom.

Perhaps I should refactor the code such that you can compile it into
flashrom and also with olpcflash.  Shouldn't increase the size much.
We are only talking a couple of extra layer functions.

-- 
Richard A. Smith