[Testing] Call for help for testing specific items

[Daniel Drake]

Thanks for the tesing!

On 26 June 2011 05:27,  <forster at ozonline.com.au> wrote:
> The laptop with the bad sectors that wont boot on OS22/23 boots OS870 OK

Good to hear. Please keep your eyes open for the next development
cycle where we will revisit the ubifs boot problem. So far you are the
only one who can reproduce it on-demand.

> The stamp area in Paint is tiny (maybe I'm not using it right)

Also looks odd to me - CCing Gonzalo. Here's what I did:

1. Draw a fairly large linear shape
2. Select it
3. Click the stamp tool
4. Click on other parts of the Canvas to 'stamp' in

The stamped version is tiny and the shape can barely be made out.
Tested on XO-1.

> 10699 Opened pdf OK in Browse
> 10427 Memorise journal entry icon is OK
>     Scratch saved to journal ->usb ->journal, opened OK
> 10854 Paint launches OK, draw rectangle, select paintbrush OK
> 10726 Rotate all canvas OK
> 10909 Nothing selected, stamp and resize unavailable, rotate is available (see10726) OK
> 6493 portrait mode horizontal scroll OK
> 8352 no warnings closing empty read session, OK
> 10961 took photo OK on 5 sec timer
> 10923 Fn space reveals Paint source OK

Thanks - noted your verification on these tickets, Sam will probably
close some/most in response.

> 10599 Jukebox is not a X01.0 favorite

Yep, we changed our mind on that one. closed.

> 10966 Calculate named OK en

Need more details on how you tested this, since it only was named
badly in certain places. I added test details to the ticket.

> 10853 Clock Ok

Need a bit more than an "OK" here to know exactly what you tested. The
ticket mentions that testing in multiple languages is needed. Even if
you didn't have time to run the full test as requested, your "OK" is
still useful (thanks!) but we would benefit from knowing exactly what
is being OK'd :)

> 3703 Text toolbar OK

Not sure which ticket you are referring to here,
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/3703 is not on the list.

> 10956 renamed a few sessions OK

Need a few more details on your test here - where did you do the
renaming? Activity or journal? Did you check the specific case
mentioned on the ticket?

> 10725 Created an Ad Hoc net on another laptop and joined, shut lid and resumed, could not test resumption of Ad Hoc net because it rejoined the Wifi router instead

This is the desired behaviour - we always prefer solid and stable
networks over unreliable throwaway ad-hoc ones. Needs testing when
there are no favourite networks that Sugar would otherwise connect to.


Thanks! This is really useful for us.

Daniel