[Testing] [IAEP] Follow-up. Next Question: How many boxes?

[rihoward1 at gmail.com]

Caryl,


Take a look at http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewforum.php?f=8 
You might find the answer there.

rihoward1 at gmail.com

linux - the best things in life are free





On Nov 7, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:

> Yes, you can run lots of VM's in VB. Two of the ones I have in it work fine. My question is actually, can I run 2 Virtual Boxes on my MacBook? One would be the one I already have with a beta version of SoaS and Maple Syrup running just fine and 3 others that don't work and freeze my computer when I try to use them. The other would be a fresh, clean copy of the newest version of VB.  
> 
> Are there any special considerations in doing this?
> 
> Caryl
> 
> > Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:08:58 +0000
> > Subject: Re: [IAEP] Follow-up. Next Question: How many boxes?
> > From: pbrobinson at gmail.com
> > To: cbigenho at hotmail.com
> > CC: support-gang at laptop.org; testing at lists.laptop.org
> > 
> > I've never used VB before so I'm not sure but I'm sure you can run
> > multiple VMs on Virtual Box.
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thank you Peter!
> > > That may be part of my problem.  Now... since I have a very old beta version
> > > of SoaS and Maple Syrup running great in my current Virtual Box, I really
> > > don't want to mess with it any more.  Is there any reason I can't install a
> > > second VB on my MacBook to try to get Strawberry and Blueberry to work on it
> > > (without the boot-helper disk)? Do I have to follow any special naming
> > > convention to do this?
> > > Caryl
> > >
> > >
> > >> Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 17:32:25 +0000
> > >> Subject: Re: [IAEP] Follow-up. Next Question: Which Fedora?
> > >> From: pbrobinson at gmail.com
> > >> To: cbigenho at hotmail.com
> > >> CC: support-gang at laptop.org; iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org;
> > >> testing at lists.laptop.org
> > >>
> > >> Blueberry was just 32bit. Mirabelle was the first to support both 32
> > >> and 64 bit, it was one of the side effects of the move to Fedora infra
> > >> and release process.
> > >>
> > >> Peter
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho at hotmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Thanks for the answers to the .iso vs .vdi question.  Now, is SoaS
> > >> > Blueberry
> > >> > done in Fedora or Fedora 64?
> > >> > Caryl
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> > >> > IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> > >> >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> Testing mailing list
> Testing at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/testing/attachments/20101107/fd40beed/attachment-0001.htm