[Testing] Activity Testing Matrix

[Kim Quirk]

Thanks Greg. I know this is an area where we could use a lot of help.

Kim

On Nov 13, 2007 11:13 AM, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, SJ Klein wrote:
>
> > Not really.  [[Activity bundle] and [[creating an activity]] both exist;
> > the list of things that Must Be Done should be linked form the top of
> > the [[activity]] page...
>
> Lemme work on that today.
>
> By end of day today, I'd like to have a draft of "The Developer Email"
> that gets sent everywhere.  I want to make sure that first communication
> is clear and concise, and gets people moving.
>
> --g
>
>
> > SJ
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Samuel Klein wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I like it.  Also, during phase one, we need to tell activity
> developers
> >>> the other things they should be doing : versioning their activity,
> putting
> >>> both source links and links to an .xo file online, adding metadata and
> >>> test plans. Ditto for library bundle creators; bundles are bundles.
> >>
> >> Absolutely.  So I guess *I* need to understand all the things that an
> >> activity developer needs to be doing, heh.
> >>
> >> Is there one good page that contains the canonical information for
> "what an
> >> activity developer must to do get their activity ready for prime time"?
> >>
> >> --g
> >>
> >>> SJ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So looks like folks are starting to try it out.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's what I'd like to do next.
> >>>>
> >>>> Phase One, PUBLICIZE TO DEVELOPERS.  I want every activity developer
> to
> >>>> know that *this is the place* to link their activities and plans for
> >>>> testing.  So I would like to send an email where activity developers
> will
> >>>> read it.  Should this note go to devel at laptop.org?  sugar at laptop.org?
> >>>> Other places?
> >>>>
> >>>> After developers have had a few days to (a) put their activity info
> up on
> >>>> the matrix, (b) try to puzzle out test cases, (c) point out the
> places
> >>>> where the process is probably busted, and (d) complain about how
> terribly
> >>>> inefficient a wiki-based system is for QA (heh), I'd like to move on
> >>>> to...
> >>>>
> >>>> Phase Two, PUBLICIZE TO EVERYONE ELSE.  And I mean *everyone* else.
> >>>> Fedora folks, Ubuntu folks, Debian folks, SuSE folks.  LUG mailing
> lists.
> >>>> Slashdot. Digg.  The message should look like this: "OLPC needs your
> >>>> help, RIGHT NOW. All you need is a modern Linux distro (or even a
> Windows
> >>>> machine) and a couple of hours a day for the next several weeks, and
> you
> >>>> can be intimately involved in the most important software project in
> the
> >>>> history of mankind."
> >>>>
> >>>> Any objection to this plan?  Pointers?  Comments?
> >>>>
> >>>> --g
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Greg DeKoenigsberg
> >>>> Community Development Manager
> >>>> Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
> >>>> "To whomsoever much hath been given...
> >>>> ...from him much shall be asked"
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Greg DeKoenigsberg
> >> Community Development Manager
> >> Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
> >> "To whomsoever much hath been given...
> >> ...from him much shall be asked"
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Greg DeKoenigsberg
> Community Development Manager
> Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
> "To whomsoever much hath been given...
> ...from him much shall be asked"
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/private/testing/attachments/20071113/106b908c/attachment.htm