<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:18 PM, David Van Assche <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dvanassche@gmail.com">dvanassche@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main,<br>
and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in<br>
it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable,<br>
iirc. Its pretty much the same policy as debian. Scratch was recently<br>
rejected from MOTU for the similar reasons.</blockquote><div><br></div></div>Would it be such a problem if squeak (and other not-squeaky-clean components of sugar) were in ubuntu restricted or debian restricted? <br><br>
vik<br>