<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Charles Merriam <<a href="mailto:charles.merriam@gmail.com">charles.merriam@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
April Fool's was a good way to present what does eventually need to be<br>
done, and what is done in some other open source projects.<br>
<br>
It's a good way of doing it, and would require some work. I would set<br>
up a set of stages with the highest and easiest pay-offs first, e.g.<br>
building versions with and without activities and with and without<br>
source would be easy. I don't know how to implement some of the<br>
features, especially code coverage metrics.<br>
<br>
Does anyone believe OLPC Foundation is up to this style of change?<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote><div><br>It is certainly worth discussing, which is why Scott added it to the schedule for tomorrow's discussion. If youa re free around 13:30 EST to present it yourself via the dialin number, that would be ideal; otherwise someone else will present for you (though perhaps not as passionately) and you can read the results in the minutes...<br>
<br>SJ<br></div></div><br>