[sugar] Signed candidate-765 and gg-765-2 builds available for testing.
S Page
info at skierpage.com
Tue Sep 30 08:23:09 EDT 2008
> Important: has anyone successfully upgraded/installed to the signed
> "candidate-765"?
1. I retried `sudo olpc-update candidate-765` from 8.2-763 on a secure
(developer.sig moved away) XO. This time it worked fine.
2. I followed http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Clean-install_procedure to go
back to build 650 (for that Christmas 2007 ship.1 feel :-) ) on a secure XO.
su -l
olpc-update candidate-765
succeeded, after errors in irsync_pristine and irsync dirty but
apparently no out-of-memory problems. This wasn't a perfect test
because I didn't revert firmware as well, I was on latest q2e18 firmware
throughout.
After reboot Software update's Checking for updates hung in Loading
groups... , just as Walter Bender reported to testing list. I think
this is bug 8681, fixed in build 766.
shell.log had two
WARNING root: Activity directory lacks a MANIFEST file.
then exception from actinfo.py, line 138, in get_activity_group_urls
with open( USER_GROUPS_FILE, 'w') that "No such file or directory:
'/home/olpc/Activities/.groups'
3. Carlo Falciola updated from 711 (8.1.2) to candidate-765 using
olpc-update -usb, see separate e-mail.
I changed the wiki Sunday night and I think all the links and banners
mentioning "candidate-765" work.
Nobody replied to my question about the gg-765-2 image below.
> Michael Stone wrote:
>> I have also published gg-765-2, a signed G1G1 candidate
>> composite image, created by Scott. gg-765-2 is similar to what we hope
>> to put into manufacturing next week.
>> ...
>> http://download.laptop.org/xo-1/custom/g1g1/gg-765-2/ (G1G1 composite)
>
> Where should this be mentioned? Should someone doing
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Clean-install_procedure copy this image?
--
=S Page user:skierpage
More information about the Sugar
mailing list