[sugar] Which to translate: Gulcose82 or Gulcose
Korakurider
korakurider at gmail.com
Mon Sep 22 11:59:20 EDT 2008
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<mpgritti at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> That sounds good to me.
>> More specifically, Calculate-24 recently announced was built from trunk.
>> It is sad to see translation in branch just skipped :-< (And I
>> can't commit to trunk - #8588)
>> Another example is pippy; it hasn't had even branch.
>>
>> I am NOT calling them bad, I just think there is confusion here.
>> If you say about intention to stick with trunk for specific
>> activity BEFORE you build release, translator could manage to keep up
>> with it.
>
> I expect some activity authors will want to branch and some will not.
I can understand this. But Then, please do not make separated
project on Pootle at first place when the author isn't thinking about
branching :-< You could postpone branching on Pootle project until
it is actually needed.
And please announce when translator should use trunk on Pootle for
specific Fulctose activitiy.
For example; if improvement to an activity targetted to 8.2.1 needs
string addition, which Pootle project to use for translation?
>
> If we branched and then released from master then clearly we screwed.
> If you can provide a list of modules which are in this situation we
> will get them fixed up (one way or another).
Assuming conflict has now resolved for Calculate, please think about Pippy.
> For modules that doesn't have a sucrose-0.82 branch, I think pootle
> should just point to master for 0.82...
As I wrote above, the fact would be clear to translators if there
is PO only Fulctose project on Pootle and not in Fulctose0.82.
>
> Sayamindu, does that make sense to you?
>
> Marco
>
More information about the Sugar
mailing list