[sugar] [PATCH] screenshots hurt
Martin Dengler
martin at martindengler.com
Fri Sep 5 11:14:19 EDT 2008
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:47:45AM -0300, Erik Garrison wrote:
> The current patchset guarantees that [journal previews] will exist
> provided the user intentionally saves their work, or properly closes
> the activity.
IMO this is the key factor in deciding how much compromise is too
much: the compromise being between, on the one hand, a
real-time-updated thumbnail of activity if it's currently running; on
the other hand, no thumbnail it all. The factors each solution would
be judged by include performance, decrease (from the ideal) in
usefulness, activity code / API complexity.
The two competing compromises, that lie just astride some key boundary
in the solution space, seem to me to be:
1) saving (the thumbnail preview, but also I imagine the actual
application state as well) just often enough that the user will never
be surprised that, when resuming, the state isn't as they last left
it; and
2) saving only as often as the user explicity asks to save (and at
application shutdown, if possible - currently, this means the app has
to be visible)
Your patch does #2, I believe.
> Can these be implemented and tested quickly? If not perhaps we should
> implement this patch and reintroduce the current functionality when
> these features are complete.
FWIW, I think that the features being sacrificed are not used often enough
to justify the loss in performance.
> Erik
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/attachments/20080905/2f413225/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Sugar
mailing list