[sugar] 9.1 Proposal: Persistent activity storage
Bert Freudenberg
bert at freudenbergs.de
Mon Oct 20 15:37:51 EDT 2008
Am 20.10.2008 um 21:35 schrieb Michael Stone:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:25:40PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>> Am 20.10.2008 um 21:12 schrieb Michael Stone:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
>>>> It would be way nice it also came back to the same page, if you are
>>>> reading a book
>>>
>>> Yes, that's also a goal, though it will certainly require
>>> activity- level
>>> changes.
>>
>> Err - hasn't that been a requirement from the beginning? I thought
>> that any activity not storing its full state and thus not resuming
>> to the exact same state was violating the system rules.
>
> Correct.
> Michael
>
> (Perhaps you are suggesting that all current activity implementations
> conform to this requirement?)
No, but they should :) The conversation above just made it sound like
it was a new idea.
- Bert -
More information about the Sugar
mailing list